Apple in Trouble

Introduction to the Case

A recent court ruling has put Apple in a difficult spot. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has banned the company from charging a commission on purchases made outside the App Store. But what’s even more surprising is that the judge accused an Apple executive of lying under oath.

The Accusation

According to Judge Gonzalez Rogers, Alex Roman, Apple’s vice president of finance, gave false testimony. The judge said that Roman’s testimony was "replete with misdirection and outright lies." This is a serious accusation, and it could have significant consequences for Apple and Roman.

The Lie

So, what did Roman allegedly lie about? According to the judge, Roman said that Apple hadn’t decided on the 27 percent fee for purchases outside the App Store until January 16th, 2024. However, the judge found evidence that contradicts this claim. She said that Apple had actually decided on the fee back in July 2023.

Referral to US Attorney

The judge is so unhappy with Apple’s behavior that she’s referring the case to a US attorney. This could lead to criminal contempt proceedings against Apple and Roman. The judge is clearly frustrated with the company’s actions, and she’s not afraid to take strong action.

Consequences for Apple

The judge’s ruling and referral to a US attorney could have serious consequences for Apple. The company could face fines, penalties, and damage to its reputation. The judge’s statement at the end of the filing makes it clear that she’s not happy with Apple’s behavior. She said that Apple "willfully chose not to comply" with the court’s injunction and that the company thought it could "tolerate such insubordination."

Conclusion

In conclusion, Apple is facing serious trouble after a court ruling banned the company from charging a commission on purchases made outside the App Store. The judge accused an Apple executive of lying under oath, which could lead to criminal contempt proceedings. The consequences for Apple could be severe, and the company will need to take action to repair its reputation and comply with the court’s ruling. The judge’s strong language makes it clear that she’s not going to tolerate any further disobedience from Apple.